AI Proposal Narratives for Construction

Before and after

The operational shift is from scattered manual review to cited answers and reviewable drafts.

Before

The team copies RFP fragments, searches for similar projects, and drafts without a clear link to each scoring criterion.

After

Converza connects criteria, experience evidence, and commercial tone in an editable draft with open sources.

Real workflow for drafting a proposal

Converza turns a live RFP into narrative: it identifies winning criteria, retrieves comparable experience, and drafts in the editor.

1

Mention RFP and experience

The user mentions @Municipal Library RFP, @Experience Matrix, and internal notes so the agent works from current context.

Municipal library RFP response

Workspace · Proposal narrative

Ready

RFP evaluation section

Generate at cursor

FileViewEditInsertFormat

ArialNormal text12BIUSH@#

Owner goals, schedule constraints, and required submission format.

The RFP prioritizes community continuity, phasing, and prior experience with occupied public facilities.

The RFP prioritizes community continuity, safe phasing, and prior experience with occupied public facilities.

Editable proposal section aligned to evaluation criteria. 1

Reject1/1Accept

2

Extract winning criteria

Converza separates what evaluators will score: community continuity, phasing, safety, communication, and occupied-building experience.

Municipal library RFP response

Workspace · Proposal narrative

Ready

RFP evaluation section

Generate at cursor

FileViewEditInsertFormat

ArialNormal text12BIUSH@#

Owner goals, schedule constraints, and required submission format.

The RFP prioritizes community continuity, phasing, and prior experience with occupied public facilities.

The narrative must show how the team will maintain partial library operations, public access, and noise control during construction.

Editable proposal section aligned to evaluation criteria. 1

Reject1/1Accept

3

Draft technical section

The agent proposes a Project Understanding section that answers the RFP and connects the narrative to provable experience.

Municipal library RFP response

Workspace · Proposal narrative

Ready

RFP evaluation section

Generate at cursor

FileViewEditInsertFormat

ArialNormal text12BIUSH@#

Owner goals, schedule constraints, and required submission format.

The RFP prioritizes community continuity, phasing, and prior experience with occupied public facilities.

Our approach prioritizes operational continuity, clear phasing, and weekly user communication, supported by occupied public-building experience.

Editable proposal section aligned to evaluation criteria. 1

Reject1/1Accept

4

Edit and export

The team accepts changes, adjusts commercial voice, keeps internal citations, and exports the section for the final proposal.

Municipal library RFP response

Workspace · Proposal narrative

Ready

RFP evaluation section

Generate at cursor

FileViewEditInsertFormat

ArialNormal text12BIUSH@#

Owner goals, schedule constraints, and required submission format.

The RFP prioritizes community continuity, phasing, and prior experience with occupied public facilities.

The team accepts the technical base, adjusts local differentiators, and exports the section as a proposal-ready draft.

Editable proposal section aligned to evaluation criteria. 1

Reject1/1Accept

Output example

A working format the team can review, correct, and move into its internal process.

Section: Project Understanding

Proposal draft connected to RFP criteria.

The project requires renovating an operating library, so the strategy prioritizes service continuity and interference control.

The proposal organizes work into phases that maintain public access, pedestrian safety, and weekly communication with administration.

Cited experience: two prior occupied public-facility projects with noise, dust, and operational transition protocols.

Pending review: adapt commercial tone, experience metrics, and responsible team members before export.

Documents used

Converza works from the project document package and keeps sources visible.

RFPs
Specs
Drawings
Addenda
Prior experience

Personas

Teams typically involved in this workflow.

Proposal manager
Preconstruction
Technical lead

Related product modules

Product areas that support this workflow.

Module

Knowledge Base

Centralize specs, drawings, addenda, meeting notes, contracts, standards, Excel, DOCX, PPTX, and HTML so the team queries the same document context.

Module

Assistant

Converza's Assistant reads specs, drawings, addenda, contracts, and meeting notes to answer questions about requirements, scope, risks, and changes with source citations.

Module

Editor

The editor turns cited findings into editable drafts for RFIs, narratives, reports, and communications that the team reviews before sharing.

Module

Instructions

The instructions library helps apply AEC criteria, internal formats, and writing preferences to RFIs, risks, proposals, and contracts.

Related use cases

Adjacent workflows that use the same document context.

Use case

Draft technical proposal narratives grounded in the RFP and project documents.

Before and after

Before

After

Real workflow for drafting a proposal

Mention RFP and experience

Extract winning criteria

Draft technical section

Edit and export

Output example

Section: Project Understanding

Documents used

Personas

Test Proposal Narratives with real documents.

Draft technical proposal narratives grounded in the RFP and project documents.

Before and after

Before

After

Real workflow for drafting a proposal

Mention RFP and experience

Extract winning criteria

Draft technical section

Edit and export

Output example

Section: Project Understanding

Documents used

Personas

Related product modules

Knowledge Base

Assistant

Editor

Instructions

Related use cases

Specs & Addenda Review

Scope & Risk Analysis

RFI Generation

Test Proposal Narratives with real documents.